Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar expressed his skepticism and questioned the necessity of a new Parliament building, stating that there was “no sense” in attending its inauguration ceremony. On Saturday, Kumar shared his views with reporters, expressing his doubts about the decision to construct a new Parliament building and the significance of participating in its inauguration.
Kumar emphasized the historical value of the previous Parliament building and wondered why there was a sudden urge to replace it. He expressed his disappointment at the Niti Aayog meeting and the upcoming inauguration event, suggesting that the current government was attempting to alter the history of India. According to him, the existing Parliament holds immense historical importance and any move to replace it indicates a deliberate attempt to rewrite the country’s history.
Nitish Kumar Criticizes New Parliament Building Event and Niti Aayog Meet, Calls it ‘Senseless’
The Bihar Chief Minister further expressed his respect for India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and admitted feeling saddened by Nehru’s demise. He criticized the government’s decision to construct a new Parliament building, suggesting that it was an effort to reshape the nation’s history according to their own agenda.
Nitish Kumar’s party, the Janata Dal United (JDU), had already announced its decision to boycott the inauguration ceremony of the new Parliament House. The party demanded that the new building be inaugurated by President Droupadi Murmu instead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. They argued that as the highest constitutional authority in the country, the President should have been invited for such an event. The party expressed disappointment with the government’s decision to overlook the President’s role and have the Prime Minister inaugurate the new Parliament building.
JDU State President Umesh Singh Kushwaha reiterated the party’s stance, emphasizing the significance of the President’s role in the parliamentary system. He criticized the government’s disregard for moral values and asserted that President Droupadi Murmu should have been given the honor of inaugurating the new Parliament building in New Delhi.
Nitish Kumar’s remarks and the JDU’s decision to boycott the inauguration highlight their discontent with the government’s handling of the new Parliament building project. Their criticism raises questions about the necessity and motives behind such a massive undertaking. The controversy surrounding the event underscores the importance of considering diverse perspectives and ensuring transparency in decision-making processes related to national landmarks.
The decision by Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar to question the need for a new Parliament building has sparked a debate on the significance and rationale behind the project. Kumar’s skepticism regarding the inauguration ceremony and the accompanying Niti Aayog meeting has raised concerns about the underlying motives and potential impact of such a massive undertaking.
Kumar expressed his admiration for the historical significance of the previous Parliament building, emphasizing its symbolic value as a cornerstone of India’s democratic heritage. He voiced his reservations about the sudden push for a new structure, suggesting that it was an attempt to rewrite the country’s history. The Bihar Chief Minister’s concerns about the intentions of those in power have struck a chord with critics, who fear that the new Parliament building could serve as a symbol of a changing political landscape.
Nitish Kumar lambastes ‘pointless’ inauguration of new Parliament building and Niti Aayog meet
The Janata Dal United (JDU), Nitish Kumar’s party, has already made its stance clear by announcing its decision to abstain from the inauguration ceremony. They have demanded that President Droupadi Murmu, as the highest constitutional authority, be given the honor of inaugurating the new Parliament building. The JDU’s insistence on the President’s involvement highlights their belief in upholding moral values and respecting the hierarchical structure of the parliamentary system.
Umesh Singh Kushwaha, the JDU State President, echoed the party’s sentiments, stressing the importance of acknowledging the President’s pivotal role in such significant events. He expressed disappointment at the government’s apparent disregard for moral values and called into question the decision to have Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurate the new Parliament building.
The controversy surrounding the new Parliament building raises broader concerns about transparency and inclusivity in decision-making processes. Critics argue that diverse perspectives and stakeholder input should be considered to ensure that such monumental projects align with the aspirations and interests of the nation as a whole.
As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the government will address the concerns raised by Nitish Kumar and the JDU. The decision to construct a new Parliament building should not be taken lightly, as it holds immense symbolic and historical significance for the Indian nation. Balancing the preservation of heritage with the need for modernisation and functionality will be crucial in shaping the future of India’s democratic institutions.