Contract killer seeks “unpaid dues” for lawyer’s murder, leading police to revisit suspects and motives. A hired killer’s demand for payment reopens a year-old murder case, with revelations of family feuds, betrayal, and a contract for death.
Meerut Murder Mystery: A Hired Hit, Unsettled Debts, and New Suspects.
A bizarre twist has reawakened the tragic murder case of Anjali Garg, a lawyer in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, after the alleged hitman, Neeraj Sharma, recently approached police, demanding an outstanding payment for her assassination. This startling turn brings new suspects into the light and has investigators reconsidering previously drawn conclusions. The chilling incident dates back to June 7, 2023, when Anjali was shot and killed by two assailants as she walked home from a nearby dairy in Umesh Vihar Colony, leaving her family and friends in shock and the community reeling.
The initial investigation led authorities to suspect her divorced husband and in-laws, who were embroiled in a bitter property dispute with the victim. At the center of the conflict was a house that technically belonged to her ex-husband, Nitin Gupta. The property was later sold by her in-laws to two buyers, Yashpal and Suresh Bhatia. However, Anjali refused to vacate the residence, intensifying tensions. This dispute, seemingly routine, quickly escalated into an assassination plot, hinting at the murky lengths people might go to settle their differences.
The Murder-for-Hire Plot.
During the initial investigation, police arrested five people, including Yashpal, Suresh Bhatia, and Sharma, along with the two gunmen who executed the attack. According to the police, Yashpal and Bhatia allegedly hired Sharma and his associates for a sum of Rs 2 lakh, intended to “remove” Anjali and resolve their property conflict. While Sharma and his accomplices were detained, Anjali’s former in-laws were released, as no clear evidence linked them directly to the plot.
However, Sharma’s recent complaint has introduced new layers to the case, suggesting that the conspiracy may have extended further than originally believed. Sharma has now claimed that Anjali’s in-laws and her ex-husband were directly involved, promising an additional Rs 20 lakh for the murder, with only Rs 1 lakh paid upfront. He further stated that the in-laws reneged on the remaining amount following his arrest, leaving him uncompensated for his role in the crime.
New Evidence and Unexpected Allegations.
Fueled by what he describes as betrayal, Sharma returned to the police with recorded phone calls that, according to him, implicate Anjali’s in-laws as co-conspirators. In these recordings, he claims to have evidence proving that the family members not only knew about the murder plot but were active participants, orchestrating it alongside the property buyers. The recordings are currently under examination, with police officials considering whether these new revelations necessitate additional arrests and charges.
Sharma’s allegations, if proven accurate, would complicate the case considerably, widening the scope of the conspiracy to include those initially cleared. The victim’s family is now hoping this shocking development may finally bring long-overdue justice for Anjali, whose life was ended in what now appears to be a chillingly calculated act of vengeance.
The Dark Side of Property Disputes: Feuds, Betrayal, and Greed.
The re-opening of the case paints a dark portrait of familial and financial discord, where a single piece of property has resulted in murder. Disputes over property ownership and possession are, unfortunately, common, but few escalate to such tragic ends. In this case, Anjali’s refusal to leave her home seems to have triggered a deep-seated animosity, one that culminated in a murder-for-hire scheme.
This tragic outcome sheds light on the extreme lengths some individuals might go to assert their claims, revealing a brutal side to family disagreements that go beyond mere courtroom battles. The murder-for-hire, executed over a relatively modest sum of money, underscores how greed and grudges can overshadow reason and compassion, ultimately leading to irreversible consequences.
The Case Re-Opened: Justice in Question.
The resurgence of Sharma’s claim for unpaid dues has not only forced police to revisit this murder case but has also raised questions about the reliability of his allegations. His testimony, although self-serving, is backed by potential evidence that could alter the course of the investigation. For now, officials are carefully scrutinizing his claims, seeking corroborative proof before drawing any definitive conclusions. Meanwhile, the community watches as the case unfolds, eager to see if new suspects will emerge and if justice will finally prevail.
A Controversial Bail: Should He Have Been Released?
While Sharma’s accusations have brought new leads, his release on bail in the first place has stirred debate. Given his involvement in a heinous crime, some question whether he should have been granted bail, highlighting concerns about the justice system’s handling of high-risk suspects. His freedom has, ironically, led to an unexpected avenue for justice. Yet, this twist leaves the public pondering whether a killer’s release, even temporarily, is ever justifiable.