Nitin Gadkari’s Critique of Ladki Bahin Yojana Fuels Political Firestorm in Maharashtra Ahead of Elections
Union Minister of Road Transport and Highways, Nitin Gadkari, has once again made headlines by publicly criticizing his own party’s policy—a move that has given the opposition a significant talking point as the Maharashtra Assembly elections loom. Gadkari’s remarks about the state government’s Ladki Bahin Yojana, a scheme aimed at providing financial assistance to women, have sparked a fresh wave of political debate, offering the opposition an opportunity to question the financial health of Maharashtra’s economy.
Gadkari, who is known for his frank and often unconventional views, voiced his concerns about the Ladki Bahin Yojana during a public event in Nagpur. His statements weren’t just casual observations; they were laced with a sharp critique of the government’s financial priorities. “Will investors get their subsidies on time? Who knows? We have to fund the Ladki Bahin scheme too!” he remarked. His words pointed to a larger issue: the potential diversion of funds from other subsidy programs to support this new initiative.
This isn’t the first time Gadkari has been critical of his own party’s decisions. But in this instance, his comments hit especially hard, coming just before the Maharashtra Assembly elections, which are set to take place after Diwali. The Ladki Bahin Yojana, while a progressive initiative aimed at empowering women, comes with a hefty price tag—₹46,000 crore—which has raised eyebrows about the state’s fiscal health.
The Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana promises to provide a monthly stipend of ₹1,500 to women aged 21-65, provided their family income does not exceed ₹2.5 lakh annually. While the scheme is undoubtedly a step toward providing financial security for women, especially in rural and lower-income households, Gadkari’s criticism has brought to light the financial strain it may impose on the state’s already precarious budget.
Maharashtra, India’s richest state by GDP, is struggling with rising debt and a growing fiscal deficit. The state’s total debt now exceeds ₹7 lakh crore, roughly 20% of its GDP, and its fiscal deficit has surged past ₹1 lakh crore. With these figures in mind, the Ladki Bahin Yojana’s cost—₹46,000 crore—poses a significant burden on the state’s finances, particularly at a time when there are growing concerns about delayed subsidies and unpaid contractors.
It didn’t take long for the opposition to seize upon Gadkari’s remarks. The Congress, Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), and Shiv Sena (UBT) quickly pointed out the irony of a senior Union Minister from the ruling party publicly criticizing a flagship scheme of his own government. Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh was quick to pounce on the situation, describing the Ladki Bahin Yojana as a desperate electoral gimmick aimed at deflecting attention from the state’s economic woes.
“The BJP’s puppet government in Maharashtra has driven the state to the brink of financial ruin,” Ramesh said, citing examples of unpaid contractors, delayed subsidies, and emergency funds being canceled for the families of farmers who committed suicide. He also emphasized that Gadkari’s public acknowledgment of these fiscal troubles only reinforces the opposition’s claims of mismanagement.
Ramesh’s comments highlight a larger political narrative that the opposition has been pushing for some time—namely, that the Mahayuti government, a coalition led by the BJP, has prioritized electoral gains over sound fiscal policy. The opposition argues that the Ladki Bahin Yojana is just one example of a series of poorly thought-out schemes that cater to vote banks but do little to address the underlying economic challenges facing the state.
)
Gadkari’s comments about the Ladki Bahin Yojana are particularly significant in light of his position within the BJP. As a senior leader and Union Minister, his criticism is not easily dismissed as a rogue opinion. Over the years, Gadkari has cultivated an image of being a practical and results-driven politician, often willing to speak his mind, even when it puts him at odds with his party. In this case, his remarks seem to reflect a broader concern about the state’s financial priorities and the risks of overextending its budget to fund populist schemes.
During the Nagpur event, Gadkari even used a metaphor to convey his skepticism about government involvement in such initiatives, saying, “Government is like a ‘vishkanya’ (poison maiden); whosoever goes along with it will doom themselves.” While this comment was made in a lighter vein, it underscored his larger point that depending on the government for subsidies or financial support can be a risky proposition.
The broader context of Gadkari’s remarks lies in the economic challenges that Maharashtra faces. The state’s debt has ballooned to over ₹7 lakh crore, and its fiscal deficit continues to widen. In the past year alone, more than 400 contractors have gone unpaid for 15 months, and various subsidies have been delayed or reduced. Even aid for the families of farmers who committed suicide due to crop failures was briefly canceled, only to be reinstated after public outcry.
These economic troubles have provided ample fodder for the opposition, who argue that the state government’s financial mismanagement is to blame for Maharashtra’s current situation. They claim that schemes like the Ladki Bahin Yojana, while well-intentioned, are examples of reckless spending that could further strain the state’s resources without providing meaningful long-term solutions to the underlying economic issues.
As the Maharashtra Assembly elections approach, the Ladki Bahin Yojana is likely to remain a key talking point. For the BJP and its allies, the scheme is a critical component of their electoral strategy, aimed at winning over women voters and low-income households. However, Gadkari’s criticism has opened the door for the opposition to frame the scheme as a symbol of the government’s fiscal irresponsibility.
In the coming weeks, the BJP will need to navigate the delicate balance between promoting its social welfare initiatives and addressing the growing concerns about the state’s financial health. Meanwhile, the opposition will likely continue to hammer away at the narrative that the government is more focused on short-term electoral gains than on securing Maharashtra’s economic future.
Nitin Gadkari’s remarks have brought to the forefront a critical issue facing Maharashtra: the tension between populist welfare schemes and fiscal responsibility. While the Ladki Bahin Yojana has the potential to improve the lives of many women across the state, its financial burden on an already stretched budget cannot be ignored. As the Maharashtra Assembly elections draw closer, this debate over economic priorities is likely to intensify, with both sides using it to sway voters. Ultimately, the outcome of this political and economic balancing act will have far-reaching implications for the state’s future.